Home > Badscience, Quackery > About a Myhill Press Release

About a Myhill Press Release

It’s ironic that as I write this, I am sitting in a waiting room, waiting to see a member of the Health Professions Council (HPC) in a professional capacity. If he’s as on the ball as Stuart Jones, then I’m sure I’ll be in safe hands.

Jones, who you’ll know if you are reading this, was recently up before the beak at the HPC in a Fitness To Practice (FTP) disciplinary hearing, following a spat with a pill peddling Dr from North Wales.

Myhill had amended her website sufficient for it to be safe

Jones had complained to the GMC about the terrible medical advice which contravened all sorts of best practice guidelines and procedures on the DrMyhill website. The GMC launched a FTP investigation into Myhill, based on Jones’ complaint, and another complaint from a GP practice concerned about the way Myhill was prescribing for one of their patients. The story is a long one, but the GMC, during the course of their investigation, suspended Myhill, questioning her understanding of the seriousness of the complaints, obviously considering it unsafe to allow her to prescribe medicine, forced her to make huge changes to her website. Eventually The GMC, satisfied that Myhill had amended her website sufficient for it to be safe, allowed her to practise again.

Over the years, Myhill has been the subject of numerous complaints to the GMC about her suspect practice of medicine, has been the subject of numerous FTP hearings, and there are still a number of complaints pending at the GMC against her. I await developments on those.

Myhill’s medical career centres around the treatment of ME/CFS patients, seemingly based on a rather poor scientific paper published in an obscure internet only journal in 2009. That paper deserves a blog post all of its own, and I shall make no more comment about it today.

Myhill bragged that a patient had killed himself

Myhill appears to have created a huge dependency in her patients, who seem to believe she is a guru in the treatment of ME/CFS, something seriously discouraged by best medical practice. Indeed, in Jones’ FTP hearing, Myhill bragged that a patient had killed himself, believing that the GMC was going to prevent Myhill treating him. This isn’t something a Doctor should be bringing the attention of enquiring minds, and has yet to be confirmed.

The tactics employed by the Doctor when defending herself against complaints, both current and past, has been to ignore the issues raised by the complaint and instead mount a publicity campaign driven by patients telling everybody who will listen how wonderful she is. It has also been a standard tactic to bombard the GMC with support letters and petitions based on this cult of personality she encourages. Indeed, it is well known that death threats have been issued against prominent CFS/ME researchers who annoy the more vociferous activist victims. The frothing hate of Myhill supporters encouraged by Myhill was seen time and time again on the bad science forum, as they wrote of how cruel Jones was being to their saviour, and them. This despite the fact that time and again it was patiently explained that Jones’ complaint was nothing to do with ME/CFS, but about the dangerous advice that was being given on the Myhill website. Examples of this behaviour will be the subject of future posts. Some of the vitriolic abuse makes Jones’ comments on the bad science forum look like compliments!

Wisely, Jones had opted to be anonymous in complaining to the GMC, but as is now well known, the GMC failed rather badly in their duty to Jones to keep his identity secret, and Myhill and her patient cabal sought vengeance in a particularly spiteful way. Myhill and her supporters knew that Jones was complaining anonymously, and took advantage of the errors of the GMC. Nobody with a shred of decency would have behaved in this way, but time and again, extremist CFS/ME victims have demonstrated these rather spiteful traits.

Myhills Manic Minions’ press release

So what is the take home message from the HPC hearing on Jones behaviour? As Pat Endicott (one of “Myhills Manic Minions”) has last week prepared a rather crudely spun press release on behalf of Myhill, I thought I could present a more balanced view. It must be remembered that the original Myhill complaint suggested that Jones had been ‘misleading and disparaging’  when commenting anonymously on the Bad Science Forum.  This was considered, and in the weeks leading up to the hearing, dropped, by the HPC.  This sent an important message to Myhill – that Jones comments were not misleading, that no HPC action was necessary regarding the veracity of the comments.

Message number one from the HPC – Jones not misleading on Bad Science Forum.

Message number two to Jones – It is rude to call people names anonymously, and we don’t condone it.

Message number three to Myhill – As a nod to respect between professions, we imposed a sanction on Jones, in the lowest category, and made it lower than normal, but your complaint was incredibly petty.

Message number four to Jones – Don’t do it again.  +++ slapped wrist +++

Post Script : Since I began writing this post, that well known leading edge newspaper “the Romford Recorder” published, then withdrew, a story more or less copied from the Endicott press release.  A much more balanced version has since appeared.  I wonder why?

Categories: Badscience, Quackery
  1. Robert
    January 12, 2012 at 7:14 pm

    Quote from above – ‘the original Myhill complaint’

    I didn’t realise Dr Myhill was the complainant against Jonas. I knew she was a witness. Thanks for clarifying that Andysnat.

  2. January 12, 2012 at 8:38 pm

    To be honest, it isn’t clear if the complainant was Myhill, Endicott or somebody else. What is clear is that Myhill was the driving force, directing her Minions.

  3. Robert
    January 12, 2012 at 11:15 pm

    Ok got you.Guess the complaint was anonymous! Irony! Sorry to be a pain, but she actually prescribed drugs to another doctor’s patient!!! Like proper BNF stuff? Not the vitamin bs on her website? And she actually wrote the scrip? She should have got done for that as well.

    • January 13, 2012 at 1:48 am

      Again, from reading the transcripts of her FTP hearings, the GP practise had complained that she had advised the mother of a patient about injections that would be needed, and to get her GP practise to instruct her on how to administer same, or better still, for them to do it !

  4. Robert
    January 13, 2012 at 7:16 am

    Ok, so Myhill didn’t actually prescribe and having read the transcripts now myself, it was B12 right? She advised prescription? Not BNF either. Hmmmmmmm ……..

  5. John
    July 8, 2012 at 7:58 am

    Myhill and Co. are out with a new mito paper and despite one of the authors either working for or owning the company doing the tests (Acumen), and who therefore stands to make money from patients ordering the tests since the paper concludes that ‘The ATP Profile is a valuable diagnostic
    tool for the clinical management of ME/CFS’ (if it is for not just diagnosis but management, does this mean that testing shouldn’t necessarily be a one off instance but rather should be ongoing in order to gauge treatment efficacy, or am I just showing my ignorance?), there is no Conflict of Interest included in the paper. I don’t recall seeing a CoI in the group’s first paper either.

    Mitochondrial dysfunction and the pathophysiology of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) Int J Clin Exp Med 2012;5(3):208-220

    http://www.ijcem.com/files/IJCEM1204005.pdf

    Chronic fatigue syndrome and mitochondrial dysfunction Int J Clin Exp Med (2009) 2, 1-16

    http://www.ijcem.com/files/IJCEM812001.pdf

  6. March 5, 2014 at 4:42 am

    Have you heard about lymphoma? Lymphoma is one of the most common types of blood cancers in human body. There are two main types of lymphoma, the first one being Hodgkin lymphoma and the second one non-Hodgkin lymphoma. In this article we will try the causes and the symptoms of this type of cancer and of course, how it is treated.
    cll lymphma

  1. July 1, 2012 at 5:12 pm
  2. January 7, 2014 at 8:49 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: